Moral Failure in Student Ministry

Therapeutic Moralistic Deism.

Student ministers know this term well, or at least they should. lChristian Smith and Melinda Denton have popularized this term out of their massive research called The National Study of Youth and Religion.

They argue the Western Church has done a phenomenal job of communicating to students. But what has been communicated has not been as biblically centered as we might hope. We have communicated Christianity as behavior modification too often and as the matchless work of a grace-bearing God who is the center of it all too little. In her presentation of the findings of perhaps the exhaustive study, Kendra Creasy Dean observed:
“The National Study of Youth and Religion reveals a theological fault line running underneath American churches: an adherence to a do-good, feel-good spirituality that has little to do with the Triune God of Christian tradition and even less to do with loving Jesus Christ enough to follow him into the world.” (Kenda Creasy Dean, Almost Christian: What the Faith of Our Teenagers is Telling the American Church, p. 4)
In other words, Dean argues that this study shows the very way many of us have raised children in our churches has worked against any sort of missional impulse we might otherwise hope to engage. This is no small charge. She adds: “American young people are unwittingly being formed into an imposter faith that poses as Christianity, but that in fact lacks the holy desire and missional clarity necessary for Christian discipleship.” (p. 6)

What has been taught, this thing they call therapeutic moralistic deism, has offered a how-to faith based on the needs of the individual over the redemptive plan of the Creator God. How has this happened, often in churches which stand firmly on the Bible as the Word of God? I would argue part of this comes from our tendency to view students as “kids” who are more silly than serious, and wrote a whole book on that called Raising the Bar. In addition, we have fundamentally made a shift in much of our teaching and living of the Scripture from seeing the Bible through the lenses of the gospel and the mission of God to understanding the Bible primarily as a roadmap which will guide us via morality to the place of faithfully serving God.

Unfortunately, many churches have taught the Bible to children and youth not as a book with one central, redemptive message, but as a collection of stories and morals with the gospel as the key story. Therapeutic moralistic deism is “therapeutic,” for it focuses on surface change, turning the Bible into a counseling manual more than the revelation of God. It is “moralistic,” because its focus is behavior modification. Acting right subtly becomes more important than believing right. It is “deistic,” because it does not require a God who is intimately involved in all of Creation and in all aspects of our lives, but who generally exists to bring us happiness and most specifically in our spiritual lives.

I call it the Aesop’s Fable approach to the Bible. It is ironically a “moral failure,” for by focusing on morality too much we actually hinder students from seeing the lifelong, holistic implications of their faith. Motivation for serving God stems more from changing our behavior than from living a life of radical faith. Such extrinsic motivation will actually work on the short term: show students how sex before marriage will lead to guilt and disease, for instance, or show them how lying will cost them friendships, and they will abstain from these sins, at least for a season. But if moral change becomes the primary focus of our faith, the long-term obedience we seek may actually be the one thing we will not see.

It could well be that we are contributing to students’ dropping out of church with our short-term focus over eternal values. But the much-debated topic of dropout rates actually fails to emphasize a more critical point, because even those who remain in our churches lack the missional drive to make gospel impact in their daily lives. In other words, how many who stay “in church” still “drop out” of active, daily, missional faith?

All this of course is not to say that behavioral change is unimportant. Our morality marks a vital part of being conformed to the image of Christ. But, a growing sense of moral uprightness and a concomitant behavior reflecting this is a result of our faith; it simply cannot be the prime motivator. We have confused the point (the indicative) with the result (the imperative), and this has not helped us in discipling students. For instance, instead of seeing the story of David as all Scripture does, tied closely to the story of redemption and the coming of the Messiah, we take a story like David and Goliath and moralize it, and in so doing we actually marginalize it. We preach about how David killed Goliath, so we can now defeat those pesky enemies in our lives. Or, Joseph’s brothers victimized him and yet God used him, so Joseph’s story becomes a means of therapy for those who have been hurt. Yet when we read the story of Joseph from the perspective of all of Scripture and the message of redemption throughout, we see his vital role in the mission of God to save sinners. That is not to say we cannot learn practical advice from David’s defeat of a giant or Joseph’s determined faith; but it is to say that we can miss the greater point of these narratives by turning them into individual stories with a moral. These are not parables; they help us to connect with the plan of God in eternity.

The practical result of turning the Bible into a series of moral truths is to assume the gospel and to minimize its role in our lives. We move the good news of Jesus’ death and resurrection to the category of “lost person only,” so that the gospel is for unbelievers, not believers. So we have our mega-youth events and we share the gospel (or often tack it on at the end) at these, but we do not teach the impact of the gospel for the believer and the redemptive story of God in all of the Bible and thus its impact on all of life. Thus, students grow up in church, learn a lot of stories, and are destroyed in one semester of Intro to Philosophy when they go off to college. They never got the border of the puzzle of life by understanding the mission of God; they simply got practical stories on how to deal with certain felt needs, and they got their eternal destiny taken care of, or so they think. Many become the dechurched—those who grow up in the church but walk away when away from the familiar (family, home church, etc). Others limp their way through life spiritually, never getting the great plan of God for creation and for their lives.

As a result too many students move into the adult world understanding their faith as something on the level of importance of music, sports, or other topics that matter but are, as Dean notes, “Unnecessary for an integrated life.” (Dean, 6). In other words, she adds, Christianity becomes nothing more than “a very nice thing.”

Following Jesus into the world cannot simply be a “very nice thing.”

A focus on Christianity as therapeutic moralistic deism explains why so many believers today confuse biblical Christianity with civil religion and the spiritual war for the souls of men with the culture wars of winning political arguments. In recent months I have moved from speaking on a variety of diverse subjects to staying focused on the greatness of the gospel and the glory of Christ. I have seen more come to faith than any season of ministry in a long time. And I keep getting emails form students who tell me how their understanding of Christ has pushed them outside the walls of the church to caring for others through the gospel. In earlier seasons of revival we read of how young people played critical roles in those movements, and those movements had a searing hot devotion to the gospel of Jesus Christ. If we will have a missional movement in our time, it may manifest itself in many ways practically, but it will be birthed out of gospel fervor not moral failure.

Posted on by Alvin Reid in Blog, Leadership, Missional, Movements, Student Ministry

About Alvin Reid

Hi and welcome! I am Alvin Reid, a follower of Jesus Christ, husband to Michelle, father of Josh and Hannah, and minister of the gospel. I teach at Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary and Southeastern College at Wake Forest in NC. I love people and have been blessed to meet a lot. I live to equip a generation of young men and women to change the world, to advance the great movement of God in our time.For the Christ follower, life is a mission trip-take it!

5 Responses to Moral Failure in Student Ministry

  1. Alex Harding

    Hey Doc! I hope you remember me….You were one of the biggest influences God used to shape me when I was at Southeastern and for that I am blessed and forever grateful. Just read this post and it was awesome and eye opening! As a youth pastor I must say that I am sometimes guilty of this…..not all the time, but sometimes. Thank you for this. God has spoken to me this morning. Once again, you have been a major factor in Gods speaking to me. I love ya Doc. Keep it up! You impact on me and The Kingdom is profound!

  2. Josh Robinson

    Wow, great post. So many things that ring true to me in my heart in student ministry. Moralism I believe is satan’s tool to distract people from coming to know Christ. Trickery to make them think they are okay when they really are not.
    The gospel is life and it is a continual process of shaping us to become like Christ. I hope I can always be wary of mixing the moralistic thought in with the gospel. It is the gospel that changes us not our own goodness or good deeds.

  3. Brandon

    Most of these thoughts are new to me. I have been in children’s ministry for over 10 years and have always felt like we were missing something. I knew that 70% or so of kids left church when they graduated and have worked hard to counteract that. This fall God brought Dave Miller to Roswell and has used him to teach me about the Gospel. I agree with all you said here, but wonder if there is not one component missing
    While the church needs to teach to full Gospel and teach it correctly, we do not need to minimize or over step the role of the family. Ultimately, God holds parents responsible for how they taught their children. Parents have a responsibility to make sure their kids attend a Gospel teaching church and that they do not not only hear about the Gospel at church. Churches need to drastically improve our content, while also equipping families to raise their children all week long. I believe that God will hold me accountable for the ministry I lead, but He will more so ask the parents what they did with the children He gave them. The few hours per year that we have with our students/children do not compare with the amount of time that parents have availible to spend with their kids. I think we can maximize our hour per week of influence by working with parents to utilize some of their hours to make the Gospel central to daily life, not just church time.
    Thanks for listening to me ramble, I would love to hear your thoughts.

  4. Alvin Reid

    Alex, of course I remember you! Thanks to you and Josh and Brandon for the comments. Brandon you are right. And, the book I am writing (this will be a part of one chapter) has an entire chapter on the family and the role of parents. I hope to follow up that book with an entire book on missional families to unpack that more. The church family and the Christian family must join hands and teach the gospel to the children. Deuteronomy 6:4-9 still applies! Check this post I read about that a while back http://alvinreid.com/archives/880

  5. Brandon

    great i will look forward to the book

Add a Comment